Think, Americans: What’s Better, Tomahawks or Michael Jackson?

Sunday, July 5, 2009
By OmEr Jamil
Jump to Comments

They say Muslim nations want war with America. Can you explain why an American like Michael Jackson became hugely popular across Middle East and Central Asia despite the hatred for America’s foreign policy and military involvements in Palestine, Iraq and Afghanistan? Anti-Americanism is a lie used by Washington to lead the American people into unnecessary wars and create new enemies. Washington needs to learn from Jackson, Stallone, Madonna, and Tom Cruise. They took America to places where its military and politicians couldn’t.

 

By Ahmed Quraishi |  Wednesday, 1 July 2009

 

ISLAMABAD, Pakistan—Two things made America more influential and awe inspiring than any other nation on the face of the earth: cowboy movies and Michael Jackson.

Long before the American Tomahawks, B-52s and the rest of the American weapons used in Iraq, Afghanistan and Palestine, Michael Jackson entered the houses of the nations across the Middle East and Central Asia.

Some say these Muslim nations want war with America. That’s typical Langley hogwash. Long before Karen Hughes and Don Rumsfeld came up with kooky concepts of public diplomacy, and long before Pentagon and State Department established offices for outreach to Muslims, this icon of modern American culture was welcomed in a region that knew little about American culture or simply didn’t care.

America didn’t need men with twisted minds and Darth-Vader plans for global domination to open the doors for American supremacy [this is for you, Richard Perle]. It happened anyway thanks to Jackson, Stallone and Madonna.

I was ten years old, growing up in the Middle East with kids who were Iraqis, Saudis, Kuwaitis, Iranians, Palestinians, Yemenis, Egyptians, Pakistanis, Syrians, Turks, Sudanese and Afghans. And I distinctly remember how in 1982 and 1983 Michael Jackson burst on the scene, to a great and an enthusiastic welcome never accorded to an American before.

Those who knew one face of America – Reagan at the time – and vehemently hated it became crazy about another American face. I am sure they could never reconcile this contradiction deep in their hearts. But it was there, the two sides coexisting side by side.

 

Aside from our region, Michael’s music opened the doors of the Soviet Union and China to everything American, not to mention Africa, East Asia and the rest of the world. Before his album, Thriller, for example, only members of the elite in some of these nations knew the truth: that there is another side to America besides imperialism, a good side.

It seems so ordinary now. But, really, think about it; closed and proud societies warmly welcoming a completely new and alien culture of a country whose foreign policy was viewed suspiciously by many.

Right about the same time as Michael’s Thriller and the moonwalk, there came Sylvester Stallone with his accent, Tom Cruise with Top Gun, and then ‘USA for Africa’: forty-five American singers joining in a song for the victims of the African drought. The song, We Are The World, gave the world this amazing message about an American nation striving to help the needy. Even the best American diplomats and the best image consultants couldn’t buy the goodwill that these ordinary good Americans created for their nation.

Sure, while this was happening, CIA was secretly supporting terrorist militias in Latin America and Africa, pushing Iraq to declare war against Iran, destabilizing governments and exploiting the pure passion and the blood of the Afghans to settle an American score with the Soviets. America’s governments were doing dirty things. But it was the good side of America that the people of the world preferred, the one that was really launched by Michael Jackson and others. The Berlin Wall and the Soviet Union didn’t exactly crumble thanks only to America’s gung-ho politicians or military strategists. They crumbled because of the enduring power of the image that Jackson and Madonna and Tom Cruise and Stallone and others spread worldwide.

This is the lesson that America desperately needs to learn today. Jackson almost launched America’s cultural supremacy in the digital age. CIA or the US military used it, not caused it. So who is the real asset?

Enough of US government using Hollywood celebrities to get back at China like Stephen Spielberg did when he canceled a contract for Beijing Olympics last year in a theatrical move to politicize Tibet; and enough of the US government using YouTube and Twitter as political tools in its not-so-innocent battle with Iran.

The Americans need to bring that time back when they came together for something like ‘USA for Africa’, an effort devoid of any political mileage, like the search for cheap oil in African jungles, which is what they’re doing now.

This ugly and militarized side of America has eclipsed everything else in the past decade. Let’s remember that Washington’s entire might in Iraq and Afghanistan didn’t and couldn’t generate the kind of real goodwill that America received with Jackson’s death.

Your Jacksons are far more appealing than your Tomahawks. Get it. Or beat it!

Jump to Comments



POSSIBLY RELATED POSTS:

  1. The Legend Departs – Michael Jackson, Pop Icon, Surrenders his Soul
  2. Reality of Israel – Americans Must See This
  3. Americans Destined to be Losers
  4. The View – Why do we (Americans) only waterboard Muslims?
  5. US-Russia Summit: Dividing The Spoils
  6. Why America is Reluctant in Attacking Iran?
  7. The US President: Employee of the Elite
  8. 414 “Special Americans” in Islamabad
  9. Video Documentary: Peace, Propaganda and the Promised Land – Media & the Israel-Palestine Conflict
  10. War Crimes | A Symptom of Hate Manipulation!

Follow us on twitter...

3 Responses to “Think, Americans: What’s Better, Tomahawks or Michael Jackson?”

  1. [...] just saw his amazing shirtless pictures over his ModelMayhem profile and I can’t help but stare Think, Americans: What’s Better, Tomahawks or Michael Jackson? – haqeeqat.org 07/05/2009 They say Muslim nations want war with America. Can you explain why [...]

    #1840
  2. The middle east has been locked away from good music like Michael Jackson by their leaders. But if you look at what happened with Iran election on twitter we can see change coming. We are so lucky that our leaders don’t treat people like that. One day they will relize that there is no god and all the killing was for nothing. More people have died because of religion. What a bunch of dumb sh**s

    #1846
  3. I just re read your post. Why do you think the USA owes anyone anything. We don’t have to do anything for the middle east & IMO we shouldn’t. Those fn people have only caused death because of religion and only think of themselves. Its all about them. And what out pouring to the US are you talking about. This crap is in your head.
    American citizen give more money to the needy than ALL other countries combined. You people just want more & more and will never be happy with anything America does to help you. Help yourself and stop the BS. Be men and stop blaming others for your problems.
    Your a idiot

    #1847

Have Your Say

Prior to posting a comment, you must read and agree to the rules & regulations of Discussion Policy.

Prior to posting a comment, you must read and agree to the rules & regulations of Discussion Policy.

Help Flood Victims NOW!!!

QUALITY QUOTES

According to Sharastani, the establishment of the Khilafah is obligatory in all situations. In no case, in no time and no situation can the Muslim Ummah be relieved of the responsibility of establishing the institution of the Khilafah according to the injunctions of Islam. — Abu’l Fath Muhammad ibn ‘Abd al-Karim al-Sharastani(479-458 AH)

TELL YOUR FRIENDS






->

Secure Site

Follow Me on Twitter