The coming of al-Mahdi and the establishment of the Khilafah
The coming of the Mahdi is one of the major signs of Judgement Day. Unlike the minor signs his appearance will signal that the Final Hour is near and that believers must ensure that they are ready to endure its trials and tribulations (fitan).
The Mahdi will come at a time when Muslims will have become disunited and where tyranny and corruption will have prevailed.The situation will be so bad that a person would wish he was not born or that if someone died he would wish that it was him.
The story of al-Mahdi, as recounted in the sunnah, is a story of hope where the struggle between Haqq and Baatil results in the believers gaining victory over the disbelievers, where the earth is filled with peace and justice due to the just rule of al-Mahdi. It is narrated by Abu Said al-Khudri (ra) that the Messenger of Allah صلى الله عليه وسلم said:
“At the end of the time of my ummah,the Mahdi will appear. Allah will grant him rain, the earth will bring forth its fruits, he will give a lot of money, cattle will increase and the ummah will become great.” (Reported by al-Haakim in his Mustadrak, 4/557-558).
The story of mahdi is one that encourages the believers to work for the unity of Muslims and the justice of Islam via the establishment of the Khilafah and the application of the Shariah as the believer knows that one day the whole world will be enlightened by the light of Islam and falsehood shall vanish. But until that day comes he must take encouragement from the bashaarat (glad tidings) of the Messenger صلى الله عليه وسلم and strive and work for Islam following the Sunnah of the Messenger صلى الله عليه وسلم.
So it is sad to hear sometimes that some find in the story of Mahdi an excuse and justification for inaction, taking the fatalistic view that we as an Ummah cannot, and even should not, do anything about the corrupt situation until the Mahdi appears at the end of time and establishes the Khilafah. Clearly, this is not the message the Companions (may Allah be pleased with them) took when they heard the story directly from the lips of the Messenger صلى الله عليه وسلم. They heard this story and they took its lessons and they worked tirelessly, first in Makkah in order to establish dar al-Islam and then after its establishment in Madinah to consolidate and extend the influence of the Islamic state. After the death of al-Mustafa صلى الله عليه وسلم the Sahabah appointed Khulafah who extended the authority of Islam even further until the light of Islam had spread to a large part of the world. So how can it be that the coming of the Mahdi has become an excuse for the resignation to the corrupt reality? Indeed, if we analyse the authentic reports about the coming of Mahdi from both a prophetic and legal point of view we can conclude the following:
The Khilafah will not be established by the Mahdi but he will be a Khaleefah coming after the death of the Khaleefah before him. In other words the Khilafah will have been established by the Muslims before the coming of the Mahdi. This can clearly be seen in the hadith narrated by Umm Salamah (ra) that the Messenger of Allah صلى الله عليه وسلم said:
“Disagreement will occur at the death of a caliph and a man of the people of Medina will come flying forth to Mecca. Some of the people of Mecca will come to him, bring him out against his will and give bay’ah to him between the Rukn and the Maqam. An expeditionary force will then be sent against him from Syria but will be swallowed up in the desert between Mecca and Medina. When the people see that, the God fearing people of Syria and the best people of Iraq will come to him and swear allegiance to him between the Corner and the Maqam. Then there will arise a man of Quraysh whose maternal uncles belong to Kalb and send against them an expeditionary force which will be overcome by them, and that is the expedition of Kalb. Disappointed will be the one who does not receive the booty of Kalb. He will divide the property, and will govern the people by the Sunnah of their Prophet (peace be upon him) and establish Islam on Earth. He will remain seven years…” (Reported by at-Tabarani in al-Awsat.According to Ibn Hajar in his Majma’ az-Zawaid the transmitters in at-Tabarani’s narration are sound and authentic.)
Notice the above hadith states that disputes will take place at the death of the Khaleefah and consequently a man will come forth who after being given bay’ah as the khaleefah will declare himself to be the Mahdi. So clearly Mahdi will not establish the Khilafah Rashidah that will return as foretold in the ahadith, and as well he will not be the first Khaleefah after the destruction of the Khilafah and nor will he be the last Khaleefah. Rather, he will be a just Khaleefah who will establish the justice of Islam on earth. This is from the perspective of the account of the story as prophesised by the Prophet صلى الله عليه وسلم.
|
|
From a shar’i or legal perspective the hadith which detail the emergence of the Mahdi do not establish any Shariah rules for the reality of Muslims of today, as they relate to a different situation when the Khilafah exists. A Hukm Shar’i or divine rule comes for a manaat (reality to which the hukm pertains) which requires a ruling, which is our current reality and not the end of time which will be signalled by the major signs of the day of judgment.
A hukm shar’i essentially is a request to do an action or refrain from it whether by way of obligation (wujoob), prohibition (tahreem), encouragement (nadb) or discouragement (karaaha). Although the hadiths about the Mahdi do not request the obligation to establish the Khilafah, as they are largely ikhbari (informative) in nature and as the Khilafah will already exist when the Mahdi comes (which is why we say this reality is inapplicable), but they certainly do NOT say it is not obligatory to work for a Khilafah when it does not exist.
Indeed the Shariah rules established at the time of the Prophet صلى الله عليه وسلم are applicable till the end of time as long as they pertain to the reality for which they came. So not only must the Muslims abide by them, so must the Mahdi and so did ‘Isa عليه السلام who came not as a Prophet but as a follower of the Shariah of Muhammad صلى الله عليه وسلم. So if the coming of a great Prophet like Isa عليه السلام, after the prophethood of Muhammad صلى الله عليه وسلم, cannot suspend the rules of the Shariah, how can the coming of the Mahdi suspend them?
As for the hukm shar’i on what to do when the Khilafah does not exist, as we see in our situation today, we need to refer to the following hadith of the Messenger صلى الله عليه وسلم as it addressed that very manaat (reality):
“Whosoever dies without a bay’ah on his neck dies the death of Jahiliyyah.” (Reported by Muslim in his Sahih).
This hadith clarifies by its implied meaning (mafhum) that it is not permitted for a Muslim to live without the presence of a Khaleefah as it censures the one who dies without his presence. Consequently, it becomes obligatory on the Muslim to work for the presence of a Khaleefah who will rule justly and work to remove, through only da’wah and political struggle, the Ruwaibidah that are our current despicable rulers. This is our reality today and the work to establish the Khilafah is the vital issue that the Muslims cannot neglect.
Whilst the coming of the Mahdi is an important subject in the books of hadith, it is almost as though some have taken the subject as a “get-out” clause to not work for the return of the Khilafah and the giving of bayah to the next Khaleefah. As though the mere mention of Khilafah in the time of Mahdi in some way excuses Muslims from their obligation of removing the corrupt regimes of today. Yes, there will be a Khilafah again inshAllah, but will we all be of the ummah that lived in darkness and did nothing to change that situation? And wait for Allah سبحانه وتعالى to bring a people that loved him and He سبحانه وتعالى loved.
يَا أَيُّهَا الَّذِينَ آمَنُواْ مَن يَرْتَدَّ مِنكُمْ عَن دِينِهِ فَسَوْفَ يَأْتِي اللّهُ بِقَوْمٍ يُحِبُّهُمْ وَيُحِبُّونَهُ أَذِلَّةٍ عَلَى الْمُؤْمِنِينَ أَعِزَّةٍ عَلَى الْكَافِرِينَ يُجَاهِدُونَ فِي سَبِيلِ اللّهِ وَلاَ يَخَافُونَ لَوْمَةَ لآئِمٍ ذَلِكَ فَضْلُ اللّهِ يُؤْتِيهِ مَن يَشَاء وَاللّهُ وَاسِعٌ عَلِيمٌ
“O you who believe! If you ever abandon your faith, Allah will in time bring forth (instead of you) people whom he loves and who love Him – humble towards the believers, strong towards all who deny truth: [people] who strive hard in Allah’s cause, and do not fear to be censured by anyone who might censure them.” [Al-Maaida, 5:54]
POSSIBLY RELATED POSTS:
- The Anthem of the Khilafah
- ANNIVERSARY – Danish Newspaper Jyllands-Posten prints insulting and degrading cartoons of our beloved Messenger صلى الله عليه وسلم
- The Khilafah Has a Very Comprehensive and Highly Responsible Nuclear Doctrine
- Israel will be Destroyed & Jerusalem will become the Capital of the Khilafah
- ANNIVERSARY – America and Britain’s Crusade against the Muslims of Afghanistan
- Hijrah, Nusrah, and the Ansar
- REFLECTIONS: Unity of The Muslim Ummah
- Repercussions of Destroying the Khilafah
- Video – Zaid Hamid – Khilafah Edition
- Politics: An Integral Part of Islam
ASA Shark and all…. This is correct, some of us are sitting around and waiting for Imam Mehdi’s arrival— just waiting and hoping for the good things will not bring the change we need. Now the question is? how we should go from point A to Point B and from Point B to C, D and Z??? What are the strategies of getting people united and work on Khilafah state and Alternate economic model? How should we mobalize people? We beleive this is the time to start working on bringing people together and get ORGANIZE… We need to find As-Habul Yameen folks and organize them under one solid umbrella… once we are organized, rest of common people will follow. We just need few in the beginning, work on them, unite, and collectively work to CREATE TRENDS… as we all know people will follow trends from those who are organized…. our dilema is, As-Haabush Shumaal are much more organized than the people of the right, even though they are small in numbers… and since they are organized, they control everything … and intelligent people with good heart, positive thinking are left behind…
AOA
@ Dear Sister Kouser,
Do you know why Miraza Ghulam Ahmed first declared himself Nabi then Messih & then Mehdi?
Do you Know about the Khilafat system & 5th Khalifah( Mirza masroor) of Ahmedis(Qadiyanis)?
Do you know about the Yemeni zaidis downfall or abolishment of Khilafat in 1962 & their current struggle for the re-establishment of Khilafah in Yemen ?
as shark reported,
“Whosoever dies without a bay’ah on his neck dies the death of Jahiliyyah.” (Reported by Muslim in his Sahih).
No one can deny this unanimously accepted hadith but we have to infer the true meanings of Khalifah/Imam.
Yazeed is the 6th Khaliafah of Sunni school of thought as Moavia was the 5th & Hussain is the Imam of shia school of thought.but what so-called khailfah did with Imam?
Why Hussain refused to give bay’ah to Yazeed?
Why Ali,Hasan,Hussain never gave Bay’ah to any khalifah? & no one dare to ask them for Bay’ah except in case of yazeed who wanted to have absolute powers in his hands both religious & governmental powers.
there is no doubt in coming of Imam Mehdi & his establishment of Khilafat-e-Ellahiya on earth.
There is no doubt in coming of Jesus as well.
we have to work for the unity of Muslim Ummah so as to support his cause.
How is shia unity possible with muslims
when they reject Quran as Unaltered book from ALLAH?
1. There are seventeen thousand Ayah in real Quran. (Al Shafi, Vol. No. 2, Page No. 616)
2. The comparison between the Holy Quran and Shia’s Quran. (which was compiled by Hazrat Ali R.A. and will be brought by Imam-e-Ghaib near Qayamat. (Asool Kaafi, Vol. No. 2, Page No. 123)
3. No one possess complete knowledge of Holy Quran except Imams. (Asool Kaafi, Vol. No. 1, Page No. 228)
4. “An alteration in the Holy Quran”. (Tehzeeb-ul-Ahkaam, Vol. No. 7, Page No. 415)
5. “Changes in Quran for Drinker Khulafa-e-Rashideen”. (Translation Of Quran Majeed by Maqbool Hussain Dehlevi, Page No. 479)
6. “Insult of Holy Quran”. (Tohfa-tul-Awaam, Vol. No. 2, page No. 293)
7. Pakistan is mentioned in the Original Holy Quran, present Quran is meaningless. (Hazaar Tumhari Das Hamari, Page No. 554)
8. Quran was ascended in four parts whereas present Quran is consist of three parts. (Shia Aur Tehreef-e-Quran, page No. 62)
9. Quran is altered corrupted and in perverted form (Shia belief). (Fatuhat-e-Shia, Page No. 129)
10. The present Quran is abridged where as the Original Quran is kept by Imam Mehdi. (Hazaar Tumhari Das Hamari, Page No. 553)
11. “An acceptance of the belief of tempering of Holy Quran, insult of Abu Bakr (r.a)”. (Ayat-ul-Qaloob, Vol. No. 2, Page No. 832)
12. Shaikheen (r.a) refused to accept the Quran which was compiled by Hazrat Ali (r.a). (Fasal-ul-Khitab, Page No. 64)
13. Quran was eaten by God. (Min Kitab-ul-Burhan Fee Tafseer-ul-Quran, Page No. 38)
14. Renegades changed the Original Holy Quran. (Quran Majeed by Hakeem Syed Maqbool, Page No. 1011)
15. “Un Islamic views of Holy Quran and revive of Abu Bakr”. (Sheikh-e-Saqifa, Page No. 138)
16. The main compilers of Quran interpreted changed corrupted and perverted the Holy Quran. (Al-Ehtijaj, Page No. 257)
1. “An insulting remarks against Hazrat Talha and Hazrat Zubair (r.a)”. (Asool Kaafi, Page No. 345)
2. Sahabah (r.a) became infidel by denying the divine right (Wilayat) of Hazrat Ali. First three caliph and other Sahabas became infidel by denying the divine right of (Wilayat) of Hazrat Ali. (Asool Kaafi, Page No. 420)
3. After the said demised of the Prophet, all Sahabah turned apostate except four. (Israr-e-Muhammad, Page No. 43)
4. Hazrat Abu Bakr (r.a) could not recite Kalma at the time of his death. (Israr-e-Muhammad, Page No. 211)
5. Shaitan was the first to sworn the oath of allegiance from Abu Bakr in the mosque. (Israr-e-Muhammad, Page No. 30)
6. It is infidelity (Kufr) to doubt about the infidelity (Kufr) of Hazrat Umar. (Jila-ul-Ayoun, Page No. 63)
7. “Verdict of infidelity on first three caliphs”. (Anwaar-e-Naumania, Page No. 81)
8. Those who deny the first of Hazrat Ali Caliphate are infidels. (Anwaar-e-Naumania, Vol. No. 3, Page No. 264)
9. “An insulting remarks against Hazrat Umar”. (Anwaar-e-Naumania, Vol. No 1, Page No. 82)
10. Abu Bakr and Umar were more tyrant than Shaitan. (Haq-ul-Yaqeen, Page No. 509)
11. Hazrat Abu Bakr and Hazrat Umar among seven doors of the hell. (Haq-ul-Yaqeen, Page No. 500)
12. Abu Bakr and Umar are the human and pharos of this Ummah. (Haq-ul-Yaqeen, Page No. 374)
13. Imam Mehdi will order, the digging out from grave, the dead bodies of Shaikheen, make them alive and will be punished. (Haq-ul-Yaqeen, Page No. 371)
14. First three Caliphs were tyrant (an allegation). (Tehqeeq-ul-Yaqeen, Page No. 468)
15. Abu Bakr, Umar, Usman and Muawiyah are like idols, they are worst of all the creatures of God. (Haq-ul-Yaqeen, Page No. 519)
16. “An allegation of hypocrisy on Caliphs”. (Haq-ul-Yaqeen, Page No. 528)
17. “A curse to Shaikheen and their companions till Qayamat”. (Haq-ul-Yaqeen, Page No. 159)
18. Abu Bakr and Umar will be scourge with stripes. (Haq-ul-Yaqeen, Page No. 464)
19. Imam Mehdi will dig out Shaikheen from their graves and will punish them. (Haq-ul-Yaqeen, Page No. 475)
20. Shaikheen will be the companions of Namrood, Firaun, and Haman in the Hell. (Haq-ul-Yaqeen, Page No. 522)
21. He who prefer Abu Bakr and Umar than Ali, is Naasbi (Sunni). (Haq-ul-Yaqeen, Page No. 521)
22. All the Sahabah were infidel except three. (Hayat-ul-Quloob, Vol. No. 2, Page No. 923)
23. “Blame of adultery on Hazrat Usman (r.a)”. (Hayat-ul-Quloob, Vol. No. 2, Page No. 723)
24. He who make doubt in the infidelity of Hazrat Umar is infidel. (Hayat-ul-Quloob, Vol. No. 2, Page No. 842)
25. Those who swore allegiance to Hazrat Abu Bakr were hypocrites. (Hayat-ul-Quloob, Vol. No. 2, Page No. 1027)
26. To accurse Shaikheen, Ayesha, Hinda and Umm-ul-Hakm during prayer is obligatory. (Aain-ul-Hayat, Page No. 599)
27. “Resemblance of Abu Bakr with Saamry (Magician)”. (Tazkara-tul-Ayema, Page No. 33)
28. Abu Bakr was the calf of the Bani Israel and Umar Saamry. (Behar-ul-Anwaar, Page No. 629)
29. Shia Imam Mehdi will order to hang the dead bodies of Hazrat Abu Bakr and Hazrat Umar. (Basair-ud-Darajat, Page No. 81)
30. Imam Mehdi will exhume the bodies of Hazrat Abu Bakr & Hazrat Umar. (Basair-ud-Darajat, Page No. 80)
31. Hazrat Abu Bakr and Hazrat Umar were the followers of Shaitan. (Quran Majeed by Maqbool Hussain Dehlevi, Page No. 674)
32. In Holy Quran (Fahsha) refers to Abu Bakr, (Munkir) refers to Umar, and (Baghi) refers to Usman. (Quran Majeed by Maqbool Hussain Dehlevi, Page No. 551)
33. Sahabas turned apostates except Hazrat Miqdad, Hazrat Salman Farsi and Hazrat Abu Zar. (Quran Majeed by Maqbool Hussain Dehlevi, Page No. 134)
34. Hazrat Abu Bakr was the first person who embraced Shaitan’s religion. (Charagh-e-Mustafvi, Vol. No. 2, Page No. 18)
35. Abu Bakr used to have abusive language. (Sheikh-e-Saqifa, Page No. 148)
36. Shia should keep fast (roza) of thanks to celebrate the day of Umar’s death on every 9th Rabi-ul-Awwal. (Zaad-ul-Meyad, Page No. 404)
37. To invoke curse on Umar, Ayesha, died on 22nd Rajab, all Shia’s must keep fast to celebrate that day. (Zaad-ul-Meyad, Page No. 34)
38. Hazrat Umar was born by committing fornication with real daughter. (Tanzia-ul-Insaab Fee Sheikh-ul-Ashaab, Page No. 23)
39. The father of Hazrat Usman was impotent and mother was prostitute. (Tanzia-ul-Insaab Fee Sheikh-ul-Ashaab, Page No. 66)
40. According to different Shia Book’s, Umar was Sodomist. (Tohfa-e-Hanfia Dar Jawab Tohfa-e-Jaffria, Page No. 434)
41. Umar was impudent to the Holy Prophet (s.a.w). (Tohfa-e-Hanfia Dar Jawab Tohfa-e-Jaffria, Page No. 435)
42. The Sahabah are mentioned as criminal, and hypocrite. (Fasal-ul-Khitab, Page No. 21)
43. Assimilation of Shaikheen’s Caliphate with penis of an ass. (Haqeeqat-e-Fiqah Hanfia Dar Jawab Haqeeqat-e-Fiqah Jaffria, Page No. 72)
44. A worst impudent of Sahabah writes that by writing the names of Shaikheen on testis, ejaculation can not take place. (Haqeeqat-e-Fiqah Hanfia Dar Jawab Haqeeqat-e-Fiqah Jaffria, Page No. 250)
45. Sunni were Sodomist like Umar. (Tohfa-e-Hanfia Dar Jawab Tohfa-e-Jaffria, Page No. 122)
46. The Sahabah are perpetual inhabitants of Hell, how can their guidance lead us to right path ?. (Ahsan-ul-Fawaid Fee Sharah-ul-Aqaid, Page No. 356)
47. The first three Caliphs were Liars and were denial of doomsday. (Ahsan-ul-Fawaid Fee Sharah-ul-Aqaid, Page No. 599)
48. An allegation on Muawiyah of committing Zina (fornication) with his sister. (Yazeediat Bokhla Utthe, Page No. 126)
49. Sahabah are mentioned as dogs of Hell. (Manazara-e-Hussainia, Page No. 76)
50. He who hate first three Caliphs, will be destined to paradise. (Noor-e-Iman, Page No. 321)
Belief of a Shia for Tauheed of ALLAH is:
1. “Bad’ah” ; ALLAH tells a lie. (Asool Kaafi, Vol. No.1, Page No. 148. A Shia doctrine.)
2. “Iman and Kufr”; Our obedience is Iman and our disobedience is infidelity, said by Imam Baqar. (Al-Shafi, translation of Asool Kaafi, Vol. No.2, Page No. 33)
3. “Refusal of Kalma Tayyibah”. (Al-Shafi, translation of Asool Kaafi, Vol. No.2, Page No. 41)
4. Ali and Hasan, their obedience is obligatory. ; (Al-Shafi, translation of Asool Kaafi, Vol. No. 2, Page No. 42)
5. “Denial of the fundamental principle of Islam”. (Al-Shafi, translation of Asool Kaafi, Vol. No. 2, Page No.30)
6. “Difference between ALLAH and Ali”. (Jila-ul-Ayoun, Vol. No. 2, Page No. 66)
7. Ali is God. (Jila-ul-Ayoun, Vol. No. 2, Page No. 66)
8. Imams are God. (Jila-ul-Ayoun, Vol. No. 2, Page No. 85)
9. “Denial of Tauheed”. (Hayat-ul-Quloob, Vol. No. 3, Page No. 233)
10. Abdullah Ibn-e-Saba maintained the indispensability of Imamat and claimed that Ali was the true lord. (Anwaar-e-Naumania, Vol. No. 2, Page No. 234)
11. We neither accept that God nor Prophet whose successor is Abu Bakr. (Anwaar-e-Naumania, Vol. No. 2, Page No. 278)
12. “Fourteen self created Gods of Shia”. (Chawdah Sitaray, Page No. 2)
13. “A declaration of Ali’s divine attributes”. (Basair-ud-Darajat, Page No. 22)
14. “Possession of divine attributes by Imam”. (Basair-ud-Darajat, Page No. 23)
15. “An acceptance of self created Kalma and insult of angels”. (Riaz-ul-Masaib, Page No. 78)
16. “An acceptance of separate Kalma”. (Asool-e-Shariat Fee Aqaid-ul-Shia’t, Page No. 423)
17. “Explanation of self created Kalma”. (Shia Mazhab Haq Hai, Page No. 325)
18. “An acceptance of alteration in the Kalma Tayyibah”. (Shia Mazhab Haq Hai, Vol. No. 2, Page No. 57)
19. To ask for help from Ali is not a polytheism but a way of the Holy Prophet (s.a.w)”. ( Hathi Kay Daant Khanay Kay Aur Dikhanay Kay Aur, Vol. No.2, Page No. 41)
20. Kalma Tayyibah without Ali Wali uLLAH is false. (Shia Mazhab Haq Hai, Page No. 2)
21. When God becomes happy, He talks in Persian, when He becomes annoyed, talks in Arabic. (Tareekh-ul-Islam, Page No. 163)
Belief of a Shia for Noble Mothers (r.a) of Ummah is:
Shia’s insult for the Umm-ul-Momineen’s, the wives of Prophet Muhammad (s.a.w.w), the Noble Mothers of Ummah, is quite obvious for the Muslims. Let have some examples from their Holy books of Hadith and history.
1. All the people rejected Islam after the death of the Prophet except three. Miqdad, Abu Zar and Salman Farsi. (Quran Majeed by Maqbool Hussain Dehlevi, Page No. 134)
2. When Our Qaim (12th Imam) gets up, Humira (Ayesha) will be raised from the dead so as to be whipped her due punishment, and so as to avenge the daughter of Muhammad (s.a.w), Fatima. (Al Shafi, Vol. No. 2, Page No. 108)
3. When our Qaim (12th Imam) shall come back, he will bring Ayesha to life so as to torment her to avenge Fatima. (Haq-ul-Yaqeen, Page No. 139)
4. “An accusation of poisoning to Prophet by Ayesha and Hafsa”. (Jila-ul-Ayoun, Page No. 118)
5. “An Allegation of insulting Ali by Fatima”. (Haq-ul-Yaqeen, Page No. 203)
6. Ayesha was an infidel women. (Hayat-ul-Quloob, Vol. No. 2, Page No. 726)
7. Imam Mehdi will punish Ayesha with strips. (Hayat-ul-Quloob, Vol. No. 2, Page No. 901)
8. “Un Islamic reviews about Ayesha”. (Hayat-ul-Quloob, Vol. No. 2, Page No. 879)
9. Ayesha and Hafsa were hypocrite and infidel women. (Hayat-ul-Quloob, Vol. No. 2, Page No. 900)
10. “Ayesha was hypocrite”. (Hayat-ul-Quloob, Page No. 867)
11. Ayesha was charged of committing open vulgarity. (Quran Majeed by Maqbool Hussain Dehlevi, Page No. 840)
12. “An allegation of insulting Ali by a Qureshi women. (Behar-ul-Anwaar, Vol. No. 3, Page No. 64)
13. “A self created allegation on Ayesha”. (Tohfa-e-Hanfia Dar Jawab Tohfa-e-Jaffria, Page No. 272)
14. “Revile of Ayesha”. (Tohfa-e-Hanfia Dar Jawab Tohfa-e-Jaffria, Page No. 271)
15. “An insult of Ayesha and Muawiyah”. (Tohfa-e-Hanfia Dar Jawab Tohfa-e-Jaffria, Page No. 65)
16. Ayesha was not an American or European lady. (Haqeeqat-e-Fiqah Hanfia Dar Jawab Haqeeqat-e-Fiqah Jaffria, Page No. 64)
17. Hafsa was an indecent women. (Tohfa-e-Hanfia Dar Jawab Tohfa-e-Jaffria, Page No. 123)
19. “Humiliation and insult of Ayesha”. (Tohfa-e-Hanfia Dar Jawab Tohfa-e-Jaffria, Page No. 334)
Salaam
Very good article,
Thank You
Hi Chinkypinky,
You spent a lot of time finding differences. Can you spend the same amount of time finding common grounds or you don’t believe in glass half full?
Also, just giving references from books is not enough. You need to explore these guys by mixing with them and get more information from their moulanas.
The document web site of shias is: http://www.shiamultimedia.com
I believe in integrating even Ahmadiyyahs as part of our society rather than treating them outcast. If they don’t have belief in end of prophecy, then it is their belief and it is not affecting me any way. If we can accomodate other religions, then we can accomodate them as well. You cannot punish people because of their faith.
Best regards